Archive for the ‘Computing’ Category

Online Privacy

It can be mind boggling to find out how much information about is floating around the internet. Even if you have an unlisted phone number, your address and phone number could very well still be very easily obtainable online.

In order for you to take control of your information, you’ll have to be a little pro-active. Keep in mind, there are many public-record sources that house personal information. There is no way to clear these records, other than to not be in them in the first place. Back in the day, it wasn’t so easy to data mine these public records for useful information – you had to deal with government office hours, less-than-helpful government employees, the questioning looks and possibly even questioning questions (despite the “freedom” to access the information, people still want to know why … and will quite possibly remember you if you’re a bit “off”). These days, however, anyone with a computer and an internet connection is able to scan these public records from the privacy of their own home.

This is a list of some of the sites that disseminate your personal information, and how to either get yourself removed from their databases, or at least get your name filtered out of their results.

This is not a comprehensive list, but it should be enough to cover the basics. Of course, if you’re willing to pay a fee, very little is out of reach, and there’s very little anyone can do about it … but this should help make it harder for the casual stalker to find you ;P

A good starting place to see how things look for you would be Pipl.com - http://pipl.com/ – Does a quick scan across a number of info sites, including social networking, discussion/comment aggregators, and photo storage sites.

  • Google PhoneBook – Visit http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/pbremoval.html
  • WhitePages.com (back-end for a number of other sites) – To remove a home or work listing:
    1. Search WhitePages for the listing you want to remove.
    2. If your search includes multiple results, find and click on your name.
    3. Click the, “Remove this listing,” link and follow the instructions.
  • Yahoo People Search – http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/profiles/peoplesearch/people-05.html
  • AnyWho - Visit http://www.anywho.com/help/privacy_list.html
  • Addresses.com – http://www.addresses.com/optout.php
  • PeopleFinders - http://www.peoplefinders.com/help/article.aspx?topic=privacy4
  • Spokeo - http://www.spokeo.com/- Search for yourself on Spokeo first, and copy the URL of your directory listing. Then go to http://www.spokeo.com/privacy to fill out a form, where they ask for the URL of the listing you want removed.
  • People Search Pro - http://www.peoplesearchpro.com/PSP.aspx?_act=optout
  • Phone Detective – Reverse look-up for cell phone numbers. http://www.phonedetective.com/PD.aspx?_act=OptOut

These next few sites require you to jump threw a some extra hoops in order to block your information. If you only do one, do Intelius – Their information powers a lot of other sites out there. If you take the time to nip the Intelius bud,  you will stop the flow of information to many other places.

  • Intelius - http://www.intelius.com/privacy.php

“In order for us to suppress or opt out your personal information from appearing on our Website, we need to verify your identity. To do this, we require faxed proof of identity. Proof of identity can be a state issued ID card or driver’s license. If you are faxing a copy of your driver’s license, cross out the photo and the driver’s license number. We only need to see the name, address and date of birth. We will only use this information to process your opt out request. Please fax to 425-974-6194 and allow 4 to 6 weeks to process your request. We will only process opt out requests received by fax and no request will be processed without complete information (i.e., name, address and date of birth). Requests for opt out will not be processed over the phone or via email.”

“However, please note that any time your identifying information appears in a public record or in a publicly or commercially available manner, in a way that is different from the particular record you opted out, it will again appear on our Website. For example, if your address or area code changes, your new information — including other associated identifying information — will again appear unless you opt out the new record. Similarly, if the way in which your name or address appears in a record differs from a record you opted out (e.g., “Michael” instead of “Mike,” or “1212 Second AVE NE” instead of “1212-2nd Avenue Northeast”), we may include the differing record.”

  • ZabaSearch - http://www.zabasearch.com/block_records/block_by_mail.php

“In order for ZabaSearch to “opt out” your public information from being viewable on the ZabaSearch website, we need to verify your identity and require faxed proof of identity. Proof of identity can be a state issued ID card or driver’s license. If you are faxing a copy of your driver’s license, cross out the photo and the driver’s license number. We only need to see the name, address and date of birth. We will only use this information to process your opt out request. Please fax to 425-974-6194 and allow 4 to 6 weeks to process your request. ”

  • US Search – http://privacylock.ussearch.com/

Offers a “Privacy Lock” service (no fee) to block access to your public records through their site, as any affiliate sites they power. After identifying the record you wish to block, they give you a form to print out, which you need to return to them along with a copy of your Driver’s License or State ID.

iStuff – Flash – HTML5

I have to admit, I’m a little ashamed at myself for not making this connection on my own. I’ve known about the work on HTML5 for a while now, and have been very excited about it, so I’m not sure why (besides being blinded by my overall disapproval of Apple Computer, Inc.) I didn’t see how their failure to include Flash compatibility in these hand-held iProducts wasn’t *as* debilitating as the knee-jerk reaction would lead one to believe.

Before I go into why I feel that way, let me first point out this doesn’t change the fact that these products fail to conform to *current* standards of expected functionality and web interoperability, and that this limitation was intentional on the part of the developers.

No Flash for the iPad

iPad Demonstration - Flash Snafoo

Does that prohibit the iPhone from being a great product? No, not at all. *I* have one, for goodness sake. It’s a great phone and app engine, sure. But to tout it as, “the most advanced web browser ever on a mobile phone” that lets you “the real web — not a stripped-down mobile version” (source) is just plain hogwash; removing all Flash content from the web is not what I would call “the real web.” Shoot, even in his unveiling presentation, Steve Jobs ran into  the “there’s flash here, but I’m not going to show it to you” box. Flash has it’s downsides, sure, but right now it’s everywhere. It’s the standard for video, advertising, and casual web-based gaming. Not supporting it is a shot in the foot.

Okay,now, having said all that… We come back to HTML5. The next version of the web authoring standard is going to have built in support for all kinds of media encoding – including video. Not only that, but Apple happens to be part of the group that holds the patients on this new, built in, encoding (source). Seems they might be holding out for that to become a new standard .. which it inevitably will, since it will become part of HTML itself, rather than a plugged-in extension.  YouTube and Vimeo have been testing out the new video tags for HTML5, hopefully in an effort to work out any bugs before the proposed standard receives final approval.  Once that happens, Apple’s hand-held iProducts will be in a much better position  than they are today. Seeing as Apple’s David Hyatt  is one of the editors of the HTML5 docs, I’m sure this has been a calculated move on Apple’s part.

The two biggest issues that are left then, with regards to Flash support, are online advertising, and browser games. These two are heavily dependent on Flash support, and so far there has been little to suggest any of the new HTML5 tags will be of use to them. If casual gaming sites, and online marketing companies want to cater to the hand-held iProduct market, they will have to come up with something, and quickly… “lack of Flash support” is a major sticking point for a number of tech-minded people, but once HTML5 rolls out, that will be less and less of an issue.

Cryptic Brings Back Subscription Deals

Okay.. see.. I’m glad they’ve reinstated the original special offer (original, meaning that it ends by launch, as they originally advertised it), but this just underscores my original objection of why have an unadvertised numerical limit in the first place? And this only heightens the marketing Hocus Pocus that graypilgrim first aired grievances over.

Here’s what I think: I understand the company wanting to put a cap on how many lifetime subs they are willing to sell -They lose money on those in the long run, so I understand the desire to limit their number. However, once they saw they were quickly reaching that cap (which they admit they thought would never happen) they should have just removed the cap… we were only a few days away from the time limit anyway so what’s the big deal?

Instead, they pull the rug out from under everyone saying they ran out, people start clamoring and pitching fits because (other than the *one* dev comment where it was nonchalantly mentioned there were “limited quantities”) no one even knew there was any kind of limit.

And in the end they end up removing the cap anyway. So all they’ve managed to do is piss off a whole bunch of people in doing what they should have done behind the scenes in the first place.

oh well.. i’m glad they removed the cap, but i still think that cap should never have been made public. just my two cents..

*clink*
*clink*

Latin Translation Assistant

I know this isn’t going to be of much interest to most people, but I can’t tell you how excited I am someone did this. I found this gem over at In Rebus, and I can’t say enough good things about it.

This is a front-end interface for William Whitaker’s popular Latin-to-English Dictionary program, popularly known as WORDS. WORDS is, quite possibly, the best translation application for Latin< ->English out there right now. One of the reasons it’s so fantastic is it gives a grammatical analysis of the words, not just a definition.

wordsIt is not without its drawbacks, however. The interface (shown left) is rather clunky – it’s a DOS based program, and thus totally command-line driven. While this isn’t so much a problem for me (being a child of the command-line era), it can be a stumbling block for those attempting to use it for the first time. Also, due to limitations of the Windows command terminal (sigh) you can sometimes get strange wrapping and truncated information without realizing there is more to see on the “next page.”

words-assistThe Translation Assistant (shown right) helps out by giving us a windows layer to the application. Keep in mind, this is simply an extension of the WORDS program; you still need to first have WORDS installed for this to work. This makes using WORDS so much easier! Switching between translation modes is clear, and simple to do, as is switching between showing definition, and full morphology.

A word of warning though – The output itself is potentially meaningless to someone who dosn’t have a basic understanding of Latin grammar. This isn’t intended for lay people wanting to know what their club’s fancy-sounding motto really means.

All in all, this is a great extension of an already fantastic application, and one that was a long time coming. If you have been using William Whitaker’s WORDS, you will love this addition to it!

You can find it, along with full description and instructions, by following this link …  Since it’s a single executable that only need to be dropped into your existing WORDS directory, I’m offering this mirror of the download as well.

Switch to our mobile site