Online Privacy

It can be mind boggling to find out how much information about is floating around the internet. Even if you have an unlisted phone number, your address and phone number could very well still be very easily obtainable online.

In order for you to take control of your information, you’ll have to be a little pro-active. Keep in mind, there are many public-record sources that house personal information. There is no way to clear these records, other than to not be in them in the first place. Back in the day, it wasn’t so easy to data mine these public records for useful information – you had to deal with government office hours, less-than-helpful government employees, the questioning looks and possibly even questioning questions (despite the “freedom” to access the information, people still want to know why … and will quite possibly remember you if you’re a bit “off”). These days, however, anyone with a computer and an internet connection is able to scan these public records from the privacy of their own home.

This is a list of some of the sites that disseminate your personal information, and how to either get yourself removed from their databases, or at least get your name filtered out of their results.

This is not a comprehensive list, but it should be enough to cover the basics. Of course, if you’re willing to pay a fee, very little is out of reach, and there’s very little anyone can do about it … but this should help make it harder for the casual stalker to find you ;P

A good starting place to see how things look for you would be Pipl.com - http://pipl.com/ – Does a quick scan across a number of info sites, including social networking, discussion/comment aggregators, and photo storage sites.

  • Google PhoneBook – Visit http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/pbremoval.html
  • WhitePages.com (back-end for a number of other sites) – To remove a home or work listing:
    1. Search WhitePages for the listing you want to remove.
    2. If your search includes multiple results, find and click on your name.
    3. Click the, “Remove this listing,” link and follow the instructions.
  • Yahoo People Search – http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/profiles/peoplesearch/people-05.html
  • AnyWho - Visit http://www.anywho.com/help/privacy_list.html
  • Addresses.com – http://www.addresses.com/optout.php
  • PeopleFinders - http://www.peoplefinders.com/help/article.aspx?topic=privacy4
  • Spokeo - http://www.spokeo.com/- Search for yourself on Spokeo first, and copy the URL of your directory listing. Then go to http://www.spokeo.com/privacy to fill out a form, where they ask for the URL of the listing you want removed.
  • People Search Pro - http://www.peoplesearchpro.com/PSP.aspx?_act=optout
  • Phone Detective – Reverse look-up for cell phone numbers. http://www.phonedetective.com/PD.aspx?_act=OptOut

These next few sites require you to jump threw a some extra hoops in order to block your information. If you only do one, do Intelius – Their information powers a lot of other sites out there. If you take the time to nip the Intelius bud,  you will stop the flow of information to many other places.

  • Intelius - http://www.intelius.com/privacy.php

“In order for us to suppress or opt out your personal information from appearing on our Website, we need to verify your identity. To do this, we require faxed proof of identity. Proof of identity can be a state issued ID card or driver’s license. If you are faxing a copy of your driver’s license, cross out the photo and the driver’s license number. We only need to see the name, address and date of birth. We will only use this information to process your opt out request. Please fax to 425-974-6194 and allow 4 to 6 weeks to process your request. We will only process opt out requests received by fax and no request will be processed without complete information (i.e., name, address and date of birth). Requests for opt out will not be processed over the phone or via email.”

“However, please note that any time your identifying information appears in a public record or in a publicly or commercially available manner, in a way that is different from the particular record you opted out, it will again appear on our Website. For example, if your address or area code changes, your new information — including other associated identifying information — will again appear unless you opt out the new record. Similarly, if the way in which your name or address appears in a record differs from a record you opted out (e.g., “Michael” instead of “Mike,” or “1212 Second AVE NE” instead of “1212-2nd Avenue Northeast”), we may include the differing record.”

  • ZabaSearch - http://www.zabasearch.com/block_records/block_by_mail.php

“In order for ZabaSearch to “opt out” your public information from being viewable on the ZabaSearch website, we need to verify your identity and require faxed proof of identity. Proof of identity can be a state issued ID card or driver’s license. If you are faxing a copy of your driver’s license, cross out the photo and the driver’s license number. We only need to see the name, address and date of birth. We will only use this information to process your opt out request. Please fax to 425-974-6194 and allow 4 to 6 weeks to process your request. ”

  • US Search – http://privacylock.ussearch.com/

Offers a “Privacy Lock” service (no fee) to block access to your public records through their site, as any affiliate sites they power. After identifying the record you wish to block, they give you a form to print out, which you need to return to them along with a copy of your Driver’s License or State ID.

Real ID – Real Fail

In case you haven’t already seen your Facebook explode with the news, Blizzard is taking their Real ID system to new a new level. Yesterday (July 6, 2010) they announced that the Real ID system would be used on their fourms:

The first and most significant change is that in the near future, anyone posting or replying to a post on official Blizzard forums will be doing so using their Real ID — that is, their real-life first and last name — with the option to also display the name of their primary in-game character alongside it. These changes will go into effect on all StarCraft II forums with the launch of the new community site prior to the July 27 release of the game, with the World of Warcraft site and forums following suit near the launch of Cataclysm. The classic Battle.net forums, including those for Diablo II and Warcraft III, will be moving to a new legacy forum section with the release of the StarCraft II community site and at that time will also transition to using Real ID for posting.

Needless to say, this has been met with much, much, much disapproval. So far, my favorite comment on the subject was made on a post over at Ars Technica:

I don’t like it. I’m not overly paranoid about my real identity, I’m sure it wouldn’t be difficult to track down at this point, but I also don’t really want to use my real name when I don’t have to. At this point my internet alias is my real online identity, far more than my name is. I post all over the internet under Xavin or XavinNydek, and it’s conceivable that there are people who recognize me from multiple places. Nobody would recognize my real name, that’s not who I am online.

That’s pretty much how I feel as well. Issues people have with privacy aside, there are other reasons anonymity is important. First, and most important, YOU shouldn’t be able to tell ME who I have to reveal MY name to. Period.

Let’s take a a very brief look at this from a non-stalker/scary-place angle. People in positions of power, or in the public eye for other reasons, need that veil of anonymity in order to have any kind of “normal” interactions with people. In this particular instance, I know of entire guilds of Law Enforcement personnel who have felt forced to cancel their subscriptions because now their real names will be revealed; GLBT players often band together in guilds, and many of these players are not Out in real life. Some of these Closeted players could have their lives ruined by a hostile public Outting; On a less “dangerous” level, what about people like me? Working in the industry, for a direct competitor, at the very best, no one would take me seriously because there is that immediate perceived conflict-of-interest.

Back to the original #1 point though – If I want to be known as KidNytro54 online, then why the hell shouldn’t I be able to do that?  Now, don’t get me wrong… I’m a huge, huge fan of personal responsibility; I feel that’s something the Internet has lost sight of in these days of the Eternal September, so I’m all for making each player have a single online identity they are personally responsible for (no more creating temp accounts just so you can post some terribly rude comments without anyone knowing it was you), but for God’s sake..

LET ME CHOOSE WHAT THAT IDENTITY IS!!

Crank Call

Pranksters

Back in March I was in California for a Panel Meeting; I got into the hotel pretty late at night, but still had time to grab dinner before the hotel restaurant closed (thank goodness – I was *starving*).

Being the raving mad Social Media nut I am, I immediately flipped open my iPhone and “checked in” *at* the hotel – before I even actually checked in *with* the hotel (yes, lame… I know).

After dinner, I returned to my room and turned on the TV. I began ironing my clothes for the first day of the meeting the next morning, when suddenly my room phone began to ring – it was a crank call, from someone pretending to be from the front desk of the hotel, reporting that there were complaints of prostitution activity in my room.

Just this week (three months later), I was testing out Spezify (a visual meta-search/information extraction engine) … naturally, I put in my name – first name only, though. One of the results immediately caught my eye: an entry for “keaven.wav” … “what the…?” I thought to myself.

It turns out, the guy who crank called me had been recording the conversation. Once the conversation was over, he uploaded the recording to the interwebz. How awesome is that?!

This recording was made without my knowledge, and without my consent

That being said, I snagged a copy of the recording, and am putting it here for you guys to listen to. I figure, since it’s out there now, it’s always going to be out there… somewhere… so I might as well at least embrace the embarrassment :P

Best I can figure, the person who called me saw my twitter/foursquare update, and decided to have a little fun at my expense. I did a search for the guy’s username on the site where I found this recording, and he has a few more of the same thing – calling people in hotel rooms pretending to be from the front desk. Meh.. whatever.

Without further adieu, here is the recording of the crank call I received in March. Enjoy: 

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

For a remake that didn’t really need to be made in the first place, it wasn’t too horrible. There was one really bad casting decision, one really bad makeup decision, and one *really*horrible* story decision… oh, and one totally obvious editing mistake that really annoyed me.
.
.
.

=========================
= SPOILERS =================
=========================

= Casting Problem =============
Katie Cassidy… wrong, wrong, wrong. Is she pretty? Sure. Is she a good actress? Absolutely. Did she fit in visually? Hell no. She looked as if she was at *least* 5 years older than everyone else supposedly in her “class.” She was supposed to have been Thomas Dekker’s ex in the movie… really?! She looks like his older sister! It was just plain nuts.

= Makeup Problem =============
One of the things that made the original so memorable for me was how expressive Englund was as Freddy. He did an excellent job of giving all kinds of non-verbal indications of just how much joy he was taking in continuing his child-killing. This new movie lacks that depth; the burned face of Haley’s Freddy is too stiff and expressionless – it looks and feels like he’s just wearing a mask the whole time. Very disappointing.

= Story Problem ==============
I understand that this is a “re-imagining” of Freddy, I really do. And with that understanding, I did appreciate the movie. I felt it still captured the same “spark” the original had, and even had numerous nods to the original (enough to make even *me* happy). The biggest story problem I had was with what Freddy had been doing that caused the parents to kill him.  In the original movie, Freddy had been a child murderer. A horrible thing, indeed. This time around, however, they made the decision to take Freddy to a whole different level, and make him a child molester… adding a different level of creepy throughout the entire movie that I really didn’t think needed to be there. I thought it was rather cheep, and showed a lack of imagination on the part of the writers and director.

The Hacker’s Code

I found this today while Stumbling around, and thought I would mirror it. Enjoy.

Original site: http://muq.org/~cynbe/hackers-code.html


The Hacker’s Code

“A hacker of the Old Code.”

  • Hackers come and go, but a great hack is forever.
  • Public goods belong to the public.*
  • Software hoarding is evil;
    Software does the greatest good given to the greatest number.
  • Don’t be evil.
  • Sourceless software sucks.
  • People have rights.
  • Organizations live on sufferance.
  • Governments are organizations.
  • If it is wrong when citizens do it,
    it is wrong when governments do it.
  • Information wants to be free;
    Information deserves to be free.
  • Being legal doesn’t make it right.
  • Being illegal doesn’t make it wrong.
  • Subverting tyranny is the highest duty.
  • Trust your technolust!

* Definition: A good is public if the marginal production cost is lower than the marginal billing cost.


Switch to our mobile site